Conversation with a Nazi

An interesting fellow commented on You Silly Nazis a few weeks ago, turns out he's a white supremecist and a Nazi. I ended up having an honest discussion with him on his front page. I presented a question, in the vein of rationality and inclusiveness, and he responded, and we've been back and fourth for quite some time now. I'm stil waiting for another response, so I'll probably update this journal in a while.

Here is the conversation, without further adieu:


StudioFovea -

An honest question, please take it seriously:

Why do you believe in the superiority or inferiority of a person based on genetics or race, with no consideration of personal or individual merit? In other words, how does being born to certain parents relate to the quality of the human's intellect and moral substance?


Altblut -

Simple, history shows us the superiority of the white race,

the white race is the most advanced and the most powerful union of cultures in the world.

hopefully to stay that way.


StudioFovea -

As I recall, history tells us that the birth of civilisation happened in Mesopotamia, with decidedly semitic peoples. And while European cultures drove themselves into a Dark Age for 500 years, the Arab and Asian worlds experienced no such backward movement. In fact, while the Church was suppressing learning and education, it was the Arab scholars that preserved the knowledge base of Classical Greece and Rome, the foundation of Western society.

What history do you find to support your claim?


Conversation split into two threads here, the bold text is the first string, the non-bold text is the second half drawn from the above comment


Altblut -

19th Romantic germany, and the holy Roman empire.

plus the viking regime in the 8th to 11th centuries.

not to mention that just about every thing we use today in our lives was invented by a white man.


StudioFovea -

These things existed yes, but what about them demonstrates white racial superiority above and beyond that of any other race? The kaiserreich lasted for little more than a half century before it collapsed on itself. Not to diminish it, but I don't see it as grand triumph far and above that of every other nation's achievements.


Altblut -

Although what you are saying is right, when we look at the general picture:
in recent history the white race became the strongest race on this earth.

I wish to maintain this status as the master race.
a status the white race loses every day. with every product we go out and buy that is not made in Europe. with each and every non-white immigrant crossing the border into the Fatherland.

I am WHITE, and therefore seek the best for my family, for my nation, and for my race.



Altblut -

Christianity is a Semitic religion. and it is no longer needed for the white race.

Arab scholars only Preserved, white people create.


StudioFovea -

Except for that little bit we call Algebra....

And they created things like the concept of longitudes, and determined the solar system to be just that - heliocentric. Copernicus drew much of his work from Arab scholars' discoveries.

Much of modern medicine, like the concept of medical hygiene, were Arab creations.

And, if you really want to go there, the vast majority of all the things the Arabs "preserved" were created by Greeks and Egyptians, neither are white. There's a reason the center of all knowledge, east and west, was in Alexandria, Egypt.


Altblut -

o.k o.k...they have their share in the common knowledge of mankind.

but ancient Greece was a white culture.
plus Egyptians had white influences on them.


StudioFovea -

Egyptian culture, astronomy, mathematics, and science existed for a thousand years before the emergence of Greek civilisation. They determined that the world was a sphere before there even was white civilisation.

How many pillars of society or advances in civilsation are directly attributable to white supremecists? And not just Aryans, not just white people.




And there we sit, I wait for his response. It is quite amazing that even after dismantling his arguments point by point, he admits it but still persists in maintaining the same conclusions, as if his decision making and rational capacities are divorced from fact.

I welcome your comments.